De-stereotyping Public Performance Evaluation
IPMJ

Yixin Liu and Chengxin Xu

Codebook

Control variables:
duration: the time subjects spent in survey
sex: 1=male; 0=female
female: 1=female; 0=male
white: 1=white; 0=not white
black: 1=black; 0=not black
his: 1=hispanic; o= not hispanic
asian: 1=asian; 0= not asian
other: 1=other; 0= not other
age: from 18 to 100
income: 1=less than $25000; 2=$25000 to $34999; 3=$35000 to $49999; 4=$50000 to $74999; 5=$75000 to $99999; 6=$100000 to $149000; 7=$150000 to more
education: 1=less than high school; 2=high school/GED; 3=some college; 4=2-year college degree; 5=4-year college degree; 6=masters degree; 7=doctoral degree; 8=professional degree(JD; MD)
ideology: 1=very liberal; 2=liberal; 3=moderate; 4=conservative; 5=very conservative
par: 1=parent; 0=not parent
state: location state
atpass: 1=passed attention test; 0=failed attention test
mcpass: 1=passed manipulation check; 0=failed manipulation check

Dependent variables:
perf: perceived performance (0-100)
send: school choice (0-100)

Treatment variables:
mode (Study 1-2): evaluation mode (SE or JE)
student (Study 1-3): the majority of students in the school are Black or White
SAT (Study 2 and 3): randomized average SAT score (vary from 1000 to 1190)
Demand (Study 3 only): subjects in the treatment group have been exposed to the experimental purpose. 





